4/3-type 12.1-megapixel Live MOS sensor; clear images even when taken at high ISO sensitivity
Elegant, compact design; includes Lumix G Vario 14 - 45 mm F3.5 - F5.6 ASPH.Mega OIS lens
Capture 1280 x 720 HD video in AVCHD Lite format for longer recording time
Full-time Live View; new My Color mode
Capture images to SD/SDHC memory cards (not included)
Average
Customer Rating :
Editorial Review :
Versatile Functions and Superb Images. Uncompromising Performance in the World's Smallest, Lightest System Camera*
The GF1 adopts the Micro Four Thirds System standard, which was developed as an extended version of the Four Thirds System standard for digital camera systems. By using this standard and developing a camera body that eliminates the mirror box and optical viewfinder unit, LUMIX® was able to achieve a dramatic reduction in both size and weight compared with conventional digital SLR cameras, to create a new-generation system camera that features Full-time Live View, high-speed, high-precision Contrast AF, HD movie recording, and more. The GF1 is small enough to take anywhere yet sophisticated enough to take you as far into photography and movies as you want to go. *For a system camera with a built-in flash as of September 2, 2009
Micro Four ThirdsTM and Micro Four Thirds Logo marks are trademarks or registered trademarks of Olympus Imaging Corporation, in Japan, the United States, the European Union and other countries.
12.1-Megapixel Live MOS Sensor: Higher Image Quality, Lower Power Consumption
The 4/3-type 12.1-megapixel Live MOS sensor featured in the GF1 offers the best of both worlds the superior image quality of a CCD sensor, and the lower power consumption of a CMOS sensor. This sensor is also advantageous for photo and movie recording with its high S/N, thanks to a new circuit structure that is unaffected by the noise generated in each of the circuits. It results in clear images even when taken at high ISO sensitivity.
Extended HD Movie Recording with SLR Quality
The hybrid GF1 lets you take both high-quality photos and HD movies. You can shoot breathtaking HD (1280 720) movies in AVCHD Lite format (MPEG-4/H.264) backed by the high sound quality of Dolby Digital Creator. And you can record for a longer time without running out of memory because AVCHD Lite stores data more efficiently than Mo
Customer Review :
Panasonic Lumix GF-1' Get one you love it!
Purchased for my wife as a replacement for her canon point and shoot digital. She loves the camera, the low light performance in HD video and stills is exceptional
Rating :
Camera bag
I'll let those who "know" review the camera (I am very happy with it, suffice to say) but I do recall there being a question as to what camera bag would work well for this unit. I have the "Digital Video/Photo Bag" from Tamrac. The tag is listed as Model #5697. The bag itself is well-constructed and I can easily carry the camera body w/pancake lens and a 200mm lens in it.
Rating :
Finally!
First off this is a great camera!
I have always wanted a smaller camera that operates like a DLSR. To me the image quality is on par with many entry level DSLRs and that is good enough for me right now. I'm not going to be printing poster sized pictures any time soon.
The camera build is excellent. It's got just the right weight to it.
The controls take some getting used to if you've ever used a DSLR as the camera doesn't expose all of them as switches and dials, and some options feel like you can't get to them fast enough at first. Eventually the controls become second nature and you'll find you can adjust settings to your liking quite quickly.
This is an easy choice for anyone who needs a smaller compact to compliment their current DSLR. You'll have it for situations when you don't want to haul out the "big guns" and still want some creative control.
No regrets.
Rating :
Nice features & images; but delicate build and overpriced
I already own two digital cameras ... a Canon D40 DSLR and a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 DSLR-Like camera. Both of these cameras have their good and bad points. Despite being very rugged, my D40, paired with an 18-250mm lens and using a neoprene strap, is bulky and heavy. After carrying it around all day, my neck gets stiff as a board. My Lumix FZ28 is lightweight and the superzoom is awesome. On the other hand, I've missed so many action shots while waiting for my FZ28's mechanical zoom to position itself. Being able to "twist to zoom" my D40 is so much faster.
I really wanted the best of both worlds ... a lightweight camera that had the manual zoom responsiveness of a DSLR. When I read about the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1, it seemed perfect. The micro four thirds system makes the GF1's body light and compact; while the interchangeable lens give me the manual zooming capability of a DSLR. So I now own 3 digital cameras!
I just bought the GF1 with the 14-45mm kit lens. I also got the optional viewfinder (EVF) and a separate 45-200mm lens. Other than the price, which was outrageous, I'm reasonably happy with my purchase.
For a casual day out, the GF1, paired with its 14-45mm lens, is small enough to fit in my purse or a large coat pocket. And, when I want more zoom power, I can switch to the 45-200mm lens. At the camera's full 12.1 mexapixel resolution, each photo is 5-7mb; so I can do some pretty extensive cropping and still have great looking shots.
Below are some of my first impressions ... pro and con ... about the GF1.
1. Image quality: In good light the GF1's image quality is outstanding.
For outdoor scenery shots, the GF1 images (shot in full auto mode) had excellent depth of field, keeping much of the foreground and background in sharp focus.
I also shot a couple of portraits using the GF1's full auto mode, with the flash on. There also came out extremely good. It might have something to do with the GF1's face detection ability; but the facial highlights were beautiful, the skin tones were accurate, and the sharpness was just right ... not to soft and not to harsh.
For comparison, I also shot the same scenery and portraits with both of my other two cameras. The GF1's images were the best out of the bunch.
Low-light shooting (full auto mode, inside with just the house lights on) was a different matter. In this situation, the GF1's image quality was fair to poor. I've read some reviews that claim the GF1 performs excellent in low light; but that certainly wasn't my experience. My test photos came out slightly blurred, under exposed and off-colored. Many museums and galleries don't allow flash photography; so I'm rather disappointed in the GF1's low-light, non-flash image quality. I may be able play around with the camera settings (e.g. ISO, White Balance, etc.) in order to improve the quality.
I haven't really played with the video mode much; but so far, it appears to be pretty decent in good lighting, and only so-so in low light.
2. Camera Build: The GF1's size is wonderful; but being tactful, the moving parts (flash, battery compartment door) feel a bit too delicate. The owner's manual clearly states that the camera is not weather sealed and advises owners to avoid using it in dusty/sandy areas or in the rain. Hummm? In fairness to Panasonic, their goal was to build a small, lightweight camera that rivals the heavy DSLR's already on the market; so in order to accomplish that goal, a whole lot of plastic had to be used.
a. Lens Mount - The lens and lens mount both have metal rings and contact points; but changing lenses requires careful attention so as not to strip/cross-thread them. Even when properly aligned, the lens doesn't turn as smoothly as it should when being mounted on the camera. I cringe as I'm mounting a lens, and then, when I finally hear it click into place, I breathe a sigh of relief.
b. Menus & Controls - Overall, I like the GF1's menus and control. They are fairly similar to my other Panasonic camera; so I didn't have too much of a learning curve. One thing I especially like is the ability to set the function button to whatever menu option I want. For example, I frequently change between displaying and not displaying a grid on the LCD screen. I set the function button to access the grid menu settings; so now I can quickly change back and forth without going through the full menu system.
One poorly designed feature is the drive mode lever, used for changing between single shot, burst mode, bracketed exposure, and self timer. Having a lever to change between these drive modes is much more convenient than what I have to go through on my D40. On the other hand, the lever is located directly in front of the camera's mode dial, making it difficult to change the camera mode without accidentally hitting it. While changing modes, I inadvertently bumped the drive mode lever, moving it to the self timer position. When I then tried to take a picture, there was about a 10 second delaying after I'd fully pressed the shutter button. After a bit of head scratching and frustration, I finally figured out what I'd done.
c. Flash - Most cameras have the built-in flash in the center; but the GF1's flash is located on the left side (when shooting) of the camera. This location makes it a bit awkward to hold the camera and open the flash. Also, if you use the auto flash and/or red-eye reduction settings, your hand can get in the way and interfere with the flash opening properly.
When the flash opens, it pops up and then moves forward a bit. When closing the flash, you have to push the flash head back before pushing it down. If you were to push straight down, as you do on most other cameras, you might break the flash's hinges, which are very fragile.
3. Lens Build: The lens' optical quality is excellent and the size/weight is considerably less than comparable DSLR lenses. Aside from the mounting issue, mentioned above, the lens has a nice feel to it. The zoom and manual focus rings have just the right amount of resistance ... not too tight and not to loose. Also, the auto focus response is fairly fast.
4. Battery & Charger: The battery life is average to good for this type of camera. For all of my other camera equipment, I've purchased a spare 3rd party battery and never had any problems with them. It's important to note that Panasonic has started encoded their batteries (supposedly for safety; but I'm sure it helps their sales too) to prevent the use of 3rd party batteries that don't meet their rigid safety standards. As present their website says there are no 3rd party batteries that currently meet their standards. The bottom line ... plan on spending twice as much for an OEM battery if you want a spare one.
Also, my other battery chargers have a flip out plug; but this one has a detachable power cord. The cord is just one more thing to have to pack when traveling; but the charger works just fine.
5. Viewfinder/LCD Screen: The GF1 comes with an LCD screen; but it doesn't have a built-in eyepiece/viewfinder. This was done in order to reduce the camera's size.
For those of us who like using a viewfinder (especially in bright sunlight), Panasonic sells an optional Electronic Viewfinder (EVF) that connects to the camera's hot shoe. The optional EVF has a diaptor dial and a button that switches between it and the LCD screen. It also tilts 90 degrees for shooting high/low subjects without breaking your neck.
There are a few issues worth mentioning about the EVF.
First, since it uses the hot shoe, you can't use the EVF and an external flash at the same time.
Next, when I slid my EVF onto the hot shoe, it slid on very tightly. As a matter of fact, the fit is so tight that I'm afraid to remove the EVF for fear of possibly breaking it or the camera's hot shoe. I'm not happy about this; but since I want a eyepiece/viewfinder and I don't use an external flash, I can live with the EVF being permanently attached to the camera body.
Last of all, on most cameras, the image quality is sharper through the viewfinder than what you see on the LCD screen. You can also see through the viewfinder even when the camera is turned off. The GF1's EVF simply transfers the LCD image display from the screen to the eyepiece, with the same LCD quality. It also requires that the camera to be turned on in order for it to work.
Overall:
I want to give this camera a high rating because (1) The GF1's features truly rival those found on larger digital SLR's, (2) It take great pictures in good lighting or with the flash, and (3) It's so lightweight and small. On the other hand, the GF1 has too many little nuances and it's way overpriced. (In addition to paying for the actual camera, we're still paying for the research that went into the Panasonic/Olympus development of the four thirds and micro four thirds technology.)
Under the circumstances, I'm being a bit generous to give the GF1 a 4 star rating. If I could, I would drop my rating to 3.5 - 3.75 stars.
Rating :
Takes a beating and keeps on ticking
Most what can be said about this camera feature-wise has been said. But I think few have subjected their camera to as much abuse as I have recently, so I'll offer my experience here.
I bought the Panasonic GF-1 with the 14-45 mm lens and used it on a two week family trip to Europe recently. Well, it came days before the trip and in the midst of chaos I left the camera strap at home and just stuffed the camera in a small, sagging camera bag. On day two, while on the road, the camera flew out of the opened bag, and landed on hard pavement after tumbling a few feet. A small section of the edge of the LCD screen was dented. I was surprised there were no additional physical damage. And this was just the beginning of the trip. In all, the camera got dropped, in the bag, a few more times (due to the lack of a strap) during the trip.
After all that, the camera performed as well as new. Pictures came out very well. No rattles or loose parts. Lens mount seems to be very solid still.
This could not be said about my Sony point and shoot (W290), which probably saw less abuse. Before the Sony, it was a Canon SD800 IS. My son's soccer ball sent it to digital camera heaven (lens came loose).
Bottom line, a very solid camera that is easy to use and produces very good image quality.
Advanced Live View 3.0" 1.04 Million Dot Clear View LCD
ISO 100-6400 (expandable to 12800) for Shooting from Bright to Dim Light
Wide 3.0-inch Clear View LCD Monitor for Improved Viewing w/ Eye-Fi Menu Status Indicator Support
Compatible with SD, SDHC, and SDXC Memory Card (Not Included)
Average
Customer Rating :
Editorial Review :
Canon's EOS Rebel T2i is packed with features. In addition to its admirable performance with an enormous 18-megapixel Canon CMOS sensor, DIGIC 4 Image Processor, a 3.0-inch Clear View LCD with anti-reflective and scratch-resistant coating, and compatibility with the EOS System of lenses and Speedlites, the EOS Rebel T2i adds remarkable Full HD video capture at resolutions up to 1920 x 1080. A mini HDMI port allows for quick connections to high definition TVs and monitors for easy viewing of your stills and video. The entire operation is simple and easy even if you are a beginner.
Customer Review :
A cautionary tale
Too often camera reviewers insist their initial dslr purchase is a transformative event. "I couldn't believe the pictures I got from (fill in the blank)." Having used an Olympus point and shoot for years, I was seduced by those claims. My pictures were good, but imagine what they would be like if I used (fill in the blank). I wanted my pictures to look like the ones in the magazines. And, based on the reviews I read, I would get that quality if I purchased a dslr. After exhaustive research, I finally settled on the T2i. Initially, I was hesitant about buying a Canon or Nikon, assuming that the hype about their quality was a direct result of their advertising budget. But the press for the T2i was overwhelmingly positive, and I decided all of those reviewers couldn't have been bought off. So once the camera arrived, I took it out for a test shoot. Since I am a neophyte, I initially set the camera on automatic. The first thing I discovered was discouraging. Canon makes a big deal about the three-inch lcd and how many pixels there are so you can consult it in any kind of weather. And the display is beautiful indoors. But out in the sun... uh, uh, it is worthless. I had to duck into the shade to see anything. So if you are an advanced photographer and want to adjust your settings shot by shot, either bring an umbrella or find some shade. Otherwise you will be shooting blind. Now, as for the quality of the pictures taken on automatic, I was stunned all right. But not in a good way. They were no better than my Olympus (the 5060 if you are wondering) and not very sharp. I know that is heresy, but that is my honest opinion. I had previously bought Amazon's highest rated general dslr guide -- a three-book set -- and consulted it. The author advised shooting in an advanced mode and to shoot at f/8, in his words the camera's sweet spot. And I saw an immediate improvement. Not that the shots were magazine quality, but I assumed that was because of my inexperience in setting the camera properly. But then I called Canon customer service (which, by the way, is superb) with a question and mentioned to the guy that I was underwhelmed by my pictures. And he explained that the camera could only do so much. A key to great pictures is the lens. He pointed out that while I had purchased the camera with an upgraded 18mm to 135mm lens, the quality still was not comparable to an L lens, which is Canon's professional lens. Well, that clarified things for me. Unless I wanted to invest another thousand bucks or more on an L lens, I had no hope of consistently getting top quality shots. Presumably, I could stumble into one by accident, but that was all I could hope for. But after lowering my expectations, I have begun to really enjoy this camera. Having tentatively moved to the advanced mode (I even adjust some other settings manually,) I have been pleased with the pictures I have been getting. And I am really glad I upgraded to the 18-135mm because it allows me the versatility I want without needing to change lenses. Bottom line: if you have more modest expectations going in (your friends will not ooh and ahh at your pictures, and you will not see them in National Geographic) you will really enjoy this camera.
Rating :
I have this camera - very cool!
Just arrived!! Still acquiring all the "accouterments" but looks and feels much better than some of the reviews. ie: has a comfortable weight to it, doesn't feel like a plastic toy!! I'm very excited to start using it with my additional 55-250mm zoom, various filters, gorillapod + ballhead X FOCUS, SanDisk 8GB Extreme SDHC Class 10 High Performance Memory Card, Lens hoods, Canon RC-6 Wireless Remote for Canon EOS Digital SLR, Billingham 503501 Large Hadley Camera Bag Made in England, the "Introduction to the Canon Rebel T2i / EOS 550D : Basic Controls Training DVD by Blue Crane Digital", the Canon PIXMA Pro9000 Mark II Inkjet Photo Printer, etc, etc!!! VERY COOL EOS CAMERA AT A VERY AFFORDABLE PRICE!!
18.0-megapixel CMOS Sensor and Dual DIGIC 4 Image Processors for high image quality and speed
Kit includes 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM standard zoom lens
Advanced HD movie mode with manual exposure control and selectable frame rates
Intelligent Viewfinder with 100 percent field of view; 19-point, all cross-type AF system equipped with dual diagonal cross-type sensors
Capture images to CF Card Type I and II, UDMA-compliant CF cards (not included)
Average
Customer Rating :
Editorial Review :
EOS 7D EF 28-135MM IS KIT
Customer Review :
I can not stop enjoying it
What I like about it: - Has all the traditional features. - Has a live shooting feature (for movies) - the thing I was positively shocked about. It is possible to take a picture with the help of LCD screen despite that it is made for camcorder. Yes, no more looking through the "eye-hole" and besides that it is possible to use a special zooming while using live shooting feature to make the picture as sharp as possible in the manual mode (perfect for Lensbaby). - Sits good in the hand. Well, if you will buy it, you will not be disappointed.
Rating :
Great Small Sensor DSLR for Indoor Sports!
I have been shooting for a couple of years with the Rebel XSI. I purchased some nice lenses (50mm 1.4, 70-200 L IS 2.8) and was getting good results, but sometimes missed on great shots because of poor focus. I was saving up for the Canon 5d Mk2 when this camera came out. I went to the local camera shop and tried it side by side with the 5d Mk 2 with my own lenses and was sold on it immediately. The speed and accuracy of focus combined with the high frame rate were great, but more than that, the camera just was so responsive in every aspect. I would compare it to driving a sports car after driving the family minivan. All DSLRs are quick, but this camera was amazingly fast with low light, high ISO situations, locking on focus and taking the picture noticeably faster than the 5d.
The one major concern I had was image quality. There were some negative reviews online, and I know the full frame cameras are the best at high ISO, low-light situations. After shooting more than 3,000 photos and 2 dozen videos over two months, however, I can tell you the image quality is spectacular for both photos and HD video. Not every photo is a masterpiece, but the "hit" rate of perfect focus and exposure is easily 3-4 times as high as for the Rebel XSI. The only trouble is, with the high frame rate, sorting through all of the photos to decide which one captures the moment the best. Considering this camera is almost $1000 less than the Canon 5d Mk 2, it is hard to imagine better performance.
There are two negative to consider, mainly for the high-end consumer. First, the camera is significantly heavier than the entry level Rebel. Second, there are no "Scene" modes, like portrait or sports. This camera is more advanced and you need to have a pretty good idea of how to change aperture, shutter speed, and ISO to get good pictures. If you leave your current camera on the auto setting or scene settings most of the time, or you are trying to upgrade from a point-and-shoot to a DSLR, you will not be able to utilize this camera to its full potential without a significant amount of time invested in learning about photography.
One final tip - I was able to record video and high frame rate photos using a 133x compact flash card without any problems.
Rating :
Canon EOS 7D with Kit lens 28-135mm
This is a hefty camera. I like the Kit lens, Macro shots are impressive. This lens is a $200 premium over body only, well worth it. The lens sells alone (depending on seller) for $377 to $409. I own it for action shots that my 5Dll is not the best at.
Rating :
Honest Review of the 7D
I bought my 7D in January of 2010.
I've used this camera for a quite a bit, both in still and video capacities. I'll review both separately to explain the pros and cons of each side of the camera.
Stills:
Pros: -Awesome ISO range and low noise -Great autofocus (really, really fast) -Frame rate is ridiculous -18mp is wonderful. Great detail. -Custom Picture Styles are extremely satisfying.
Considering I'm more of a video person than a photographer, I've really come to appreciate the stills this camera produces. They are clear, even in horrible lighting conditions. Even photos taken in ISO 3200 have very little noise.
I shoot in Manual mode, but when I need to get photos taken in a quick second, I find myself flipping it to Green Box mode and clicking on auto focus and firing off a few frames within a few seconds. The photos are awesome. Considering I photograph events, this has saved me a few times.
I bought the camera body only so I can use the extra money for a 3rd party lens, the Tamron 17-50 F/2.8. Its a great lens, but the range is clearly designed for "walking around" which I do, but when I am a good distance away, the 50mm end of the range is usually not close enough, and not sharp enough.
I do have to say, for a semi-pro camera, the still side of the camera is the highlight. There are very little things to complain about. If you have the lenses you need, this camera will make those lenses create wonderful images.
Now for the cons: Video.
Video:
Pros: -1080p resolution/ 720p at 60fps. -Manual controls during shooting. -Compact body and weather sealed
Cons: -Rolling shutter
Rolling shutter is when the camera takes a frame by "rolling" the scan lines of the CMOS sensor downwards instead of exposing the sensor all at once (called "global exposure"). This is especially obvious in high action scenes and flashing lights. Shooting at 720 at 60fps, it is reduced, but it is still evident, especially in a moving car and looking at tall objects like trees and poles (they appear to lean). This camera is best used in low action scenes with a stabilizer like a tripod or shoulder mount (which kind of defeats the purpose of having a portable camera).
-Chroma sampling
I understand that some of the readers wont know what this is. But for the film people who are considering buying this camera, this is for you.
The sampling ratio is 4:2:0. Which isnt prime for green screen. But another side effect is color grading is affected by this. It creates unsightly artifacts in the footage. There are tutorials online on how to upload custom picture styles to greatly increase the dynamic range of the camera (and custom Picture Styles to create amazing colors in the camera), but there is one more thing that affects the footage: Noise.
-Noise Reduction
The noise reduction in video is no where near as good as the picture side of the camera. Considering that some might not have the best light available, they'll have to boost the ISO, and once it peaks past 1000iso, the noise becomes more evident. Canon markets this camera as a monster in low light situations (which it is), but the noise is very painful to see, especially when the footage is mixed with HVX-200 footage. The difference is obvious.
So, since a good portion of buyers will not really care for the video, most of my cons are irrelevant. It'll be a wonderful camera for the birthday clips and holidays. But for people who want to buy this (or the 5D) for film production (as I did), the limitations should be considered.
It is a good camera for dramatic films with little to no action. But, action is a difficult thing to capture on this camera without it looking gelatinous.
Overall, its a great camera. Actually, this is a wonderful camera. It is limited in the video side, but for a $1700, it offers a relatively inexpensive high definition capability (most film quality HD camcorders are $3000+ and they have inadequate lenses) and a great "equalizer" for film students or indie film productions.
For an example as to how the camera deals with concert areas, I have this video I made. Look at the strange lines created in the flashing lights. Also, be warned, this camera will be destroyed if lasers hit the sensor (as shown is certain videos online).
[...].
Rating :
Beautiful tough camera. Low light/high ISO noise ruins it..
I received the 7D as payment for shooting my buddy's wedding. I had an XSi and loved it, but wanted an upgrade (as a T2i would have been a lateral move). When I got it home and unpacked it, I loved the feel and look. It is a super solid, tough, very nice looking camera. I was stoked. I started taking some random neutral light photos around my house and yard (with a 50mm f/1.4 USM @ ISO 100). I uploaded the photos to my Mac. The photos looked awesome. crisp, and bright. After a while I wanted to take some low light shots, mainly because I knew the wedding reception would be held in a dark area with minimal light. I bumped the ISO to 250 then 320, then 500. Shooting random pics of my kids in my darker living room at night. Holy noise!!! Even at 250 ISO with my 50mm f1.4 it's unacceptable. I was mortified but I had the wedding coming up in a few days. In a nutshell, my reception photos were complete crap! grainy and noisy. I was able to fix a few using Lightroom 3's improved noise reduction but even then they looked like paintings because it over compensates. I talked to the camera store I purchased it from and they said they have never heard of the noise problems, and that I should bring in some examples. forget about even shooting at 800 ISO let alone 1600 and higher. If anybody who owns a 7D and has experienced the poor low light quality, please leave a comment. I just might sell this bad boy and end up buying a T2i after all...
15.1-megapixel CMOS sensor with improved noise reduction
EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM standard zoom lens included
Enhanced Live View shooting includes Face Detection Live mode
New Lens Peripheral Illumination Correction setting; HDMI output
Capture images to Compact Flash Type I or II memory cards (not included)
Average
Customer Rating :
Editorial Review :
Canon's new EOS 50D bridges the gap between the novice and the seasoned pro with a perfect combination of high-speed and quality. It features an APS-C sized 15.1-megapixel CMOS sensor for tremendous images, new DIGIC 4 Image Processor for fine detail and superior color reproduction, and improved ISO capabilities up to 12800 for uncompromised shooting even in the dimmest situations. It features a refined 3.0-inch Clear View LCD (920,000 dots) monitor, supercharged Live View Function with Face Detection Live mode, plus a number of new automatic Image Correction settings and HDMI output for viewing images on an HDTV. Pick up the EOS 50D and you'll experience true digital inspiration!
Customer Review :
Best DSLR for a Beginner or Pro
I just purchased this and love it!
I have been shooting every day with it!
Rating :
CANON EOS 50D
I haven't even opened the box yet. I'm still trying to figure out why I bought it. I think it has something to do with a fifth of Dewars. However I do on a 30D and it is a fine camera. I have used Canon equipment since the 60s and I have always bee very satisfied with the quality. Anyone want to buy a 'like new' 30D:?
Rating :
Perfect
Absolutely perfect and amazing camera. I did a lot of research before buying this camera and this was the least expensive and best place to get it.
Rating :
Canon EOS 50d (with 28-135 lens) - review
I had this camera + lens now for more than 4 months ... i have taken this camera to its limit ... this review will be the result of my test to this camera. also what i liked , disliked and also what i would hope for the next cameras. also how does this camera compare to it's rivals.
Section 1 : canon 50d camera review
1 : Image size and quality :- for this camera ... i believe that canon really invested a lot in the quality of the images of the sensor. the quality is just amazing. The color information and the contrast in the levels is just unbelievable, actually i don't believe that pictures are that awesome without any kind of post processing. and of course the 15 megapixels are worth it. at first i had a rebel and i didn't think that the extra 3 mega pixels will make a difference, but i was wrong. the 15 mega pixels is something entirely different from the 12 mega pixels. but keep in mind that the large mega pixel comes with a price. the size of the images are LARGE. i use 8gb CF cards, it takes almost 400 images. and also the compact flash is expensive cards if you are aiming for UDMA cards. Conclusion ... if you are looking for a good image quality and you don't want to pay 2000$+ i would say that this camera is the best choice.
2 : Camera Speed : if there is one thing i really love about this body, it is the speed. I am not talking about the 6.3 frames per second, i am talking about the camera speed itself. processing, menus, image playback, shutter lag, start up time; basically the time you take to change anything in the camera. it is extremely fast, u just can't keep up with her. also the auto focus is very fast(this also partially the lens). but also the camera performance in terms of metering, focus adjust is also extremely fast. then of course, the 6.3 frames persecond ... not the fastest in the market of course. but as far as i need. i don't think i will need more than this speed.
3 : Low light performance : for me, this will be the only think missing from canon. there is no doubt that canon will lose in any comparison in low light conditions against Nikon. It is a fact that the Nikon cameras just produces amazing image quality at low light conditions than the canon does. However, the high ISO performance in the 50D is really acceptable. You get noise FREE images all the way up to 500. noise is noticeable at 1000. and of course after that it is noisy.i am talking about the 100% frame crops. the bottom line the high ISO performance of this camera is acceptable, but don't think that you will out-photograph a Nikon (D90) guy in low light using this camera.
4 : Build quality : the first thing that you pick on right after you hold this camera is the build quality. Instantly you feel like you are holding a machine, you feel the build quality of this camera. if you hold a D90 after this camera you feel like you are holding a toy. i think that it is the best you get for this price tag.
5 : Ergonomics : Canon cameras are ugly. the first thing i thought when i held this camera " a brick wall with buttons ", also the big pain canon delivers with changing the layout and functionality of the buttons and the body outer design with each release. Canon is just still way behind in terms of ergonomics compared to Nikon. But don't worry, it is just one week of photography and you will get used to this camera. the problem will be if you are using another canon body. The body is indeed heavy, when i am doing a complete photography day, i usually get cramps in my arms at the end of the day. One key think i like about this camera is the back wheel; much better in use than the Nikon's back dial.
6 : Ease of use : if you are a canon user ... u will be familiar with the " organized " menu system and options of the canon cameras. i find this camera very easy to use. to change the camera option between one shot and the other, i would say it is easy to use.
Soooo ... to conclude ... i think this camera is an extremely good investment if you are willing to put up with ugly ergonomics and you are not looking specifically for low light photography. Other than that this camera will perform extremely good in any other condition. What i really hate : - There is no wireless flash controller. The D90 has one, canon should strongly consider this option. already released in the 7d ... but too late - Some of the buttons in this camera doesn't make sense. (the AF-on button, also the flash exposure button on the top of the camera) - I HATE the CA mode. it is like canon is reminding us that this camera is not for serious photographers. It is for people who doesn't know nothing about photography. and this is a very big problem in the market message that canon is sending to it's customers. I mean who would pay 1200$ in a camera if he doesn't have the basics of D-SLR photography, if this camera is for begginers, then why there is a rebel production line in the first place. same also with the 5D mark II, even it is embarrassing with the later. - Some of the menu options just makes you angry. also doesn't make any sense.
that is about it. except from these points ... i LOVE This camera.
before the end of the camera part i would like to mention a point for canon that not a lot of people are aware of. canon supplies their professional software for free with the camera. Nikon only provide a viewer. The canon Digital photo professional is an awesome tools. if you are shooting raw. then this would be the best. they keep enhancing it release after release and i find my self not using photoshop or lightroom any more.
This is as far as the camera goes. now :
Section II : the 28 - 135 lens review :
i will try to be as fast as i can as this is getting to long
1- Coverage range : when you start using this lens you would realize that this was targeted to the full frame cameras. the 28 is extremely narrow. if you are planing to get landscape images ... FORGET it. the 135 on the other hand is really useful (with the 1.6 factor). you get good zoom on this camera ... like u are using a 70-200 on a full frame body. So this lens would make a great general purpose lens on a full frame body, however it is acceptable on this body.
2- Quality & performance : this lens delivers nice sharp results, relatively accurate in terms of focusing and extremely fast. produces a very smooth bokeh detail when pushed to its lowest f stop. u see some chromatic aberrations around some edges in pictures which are not exposed correctly. i didn't feel any vignetting in the pictures. in all ... this lens will deliver you an image with extremely satisfactory results.(if you know how to adjust the camera options to make the most of it)
3- Build quality : like the 50D, really good but really heavy. one thing i don't like about this lens is that if you are pointing it downwards, you find the barrel zooming in automatically (cuz of the heavy glass element in the front). same thing happens if you are pointing it upwards.
i would suggest u get the lens hood, also a UV filter. the filter size is HUGE for a kit lens. and you will find it collecting lots of smudges and dust.
To conclude on all :
I love this camera, it's pros so much out weights its cons. i would suggest this camera for anyone who wants to get out of the rebel line, it would also make a great back up body for those using 1ds and 5ds. with relatively low price, and you will get a very satisfactory results. Don't believe the reviews talking about low quality images. wither they don't know how to use the camera, or they are using bad lenses.
finally ... how much it compares to : D90 : (almost the same price 200$ difference )depends on what you want. if you are not looking for low light performance, then this is the camera for you. D300 : it is not available anymore, as Nikon introduced the d300s which is aimed at a higher end market with much expensive price tag. i would go with this camera. at least canon still puts it in its camera list :-). 7D : if you have no problems spending extra 600$ then of course get the 7d, all the cons in the 50d are gone in the 7D. but i would prefer to get a 50D then step up from it to a 5d MarkII.
well ... that is it. i hope this review was useful. i tried to outline all the things i really like and hate in this camera.
please feel free to comment and ask about anything in this review. thanks Mously
Rating :
Great camera!!!
I am a beginner....and I love this camera!! I am learning all the features...and I know that will take some time. Overall this camera is easy to use and is one of the best purchases I have made! Totally love it!!
12.4-megapixel CMOS sensor with Pentax Shake Reduction; HDR image capture
Kit includes 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AL lens
Capture widescreen HD 720p video at 24fps; 2.7-inch LCD with autofocus and Face Detection Live View
4.7fps capture rate with 1/6000 sec max shutter speed; 11-point wide-angle autofocus
Powered by AA lithium batteries; capture images and video to SD/SDHC memory (not included)
Average
Customer Rating :
Editorial Review :
The Pentax K-X DSLR Digital Camera is the perfect model for hobbyists, photographers and beginners that don’t want to sacrifice camera quality for price! This DSLR has a 12.4 megapixel images sensor and in-camera shake reduction technology. It’s capable of capturing 720p HD video at a steady 24 frames per second, and features several essential tools to improve your pictures such as Face Recognition, contrast autofocus, various picture modes so you can adjust your shot to various light conditions, and more. You can capture fast-action shots with thePentax K-X DSLR Digital Camera's continuous frame rate of 4.7FPS (frames per second). Check out the Pentax K-X DSLR Digital Camera and 18-55MM Lens today!
Customer Review :
Pentax K-x is great camera
I couldn't beat the price for this entry level DSLR. It's got all the features I want, a neat look and is overall sturdy. I went with Pentax because all their older lenses (even going back into the '70s) work with the new cameras. They don't have the pull of Nikon or Canon, but they still have a good reputation with a small cultish community backing Pentax products.
I went with this specific model because of the good price vs quality ratio, fast firing speed and unique look.
I have traveled everywhere with this camera and it has survived. I didn't expect metal casing/heavy plastic or weather sealing at this price level, but the addition of this would have put it over the top.
Rating :
Produces amazing images!
A first time DSLR buyer, I am very pleased with the ease of use (user manual very helpful to get new owner started) and the results that this camera can produce. Matched with the used 1970s vintage "beginning photography" book I also purchased via Amazon, I am confident with my stormtrooper white K-x after only 2 weeks "practice and experimentation". If you're a beginner, take a chance with this camera, as it is nearly self-navigates to create wonderful images. I am now in search of a reasonably priced Pentzx DA 55mm-300mm zoom lens.
Rating :
Best Camera i've ever owned!
This Camera is amazing, definitely the best entry level Dslr on the market, by far! it's light weight, stylish, easy to use, while also having advanced features, such as the in camera processing, which spares you from purchasing such software, i highly recommend this camera.
Rating :
Nice starter
I am not a picture person. I have never been the "point and shoot in my pocket at all times" kind of girl. I did decide that taking photographs might be something I could get into, however. I chose this camera for some features it has over others in the lower price range (mp, in-camera filters, LV). I haven't even gotten around to ordering the rechargeable batteries yet b/c the first set just died after something like 1200 pictures. This camera has not disappointed. I am already aware of the weakness of the kit lense, but that will be the next thing I decide to spoil myself with. Any recommendations for a macro/portrait kind of shooter?
Rating :
Sloppy Technology, Noisy Mechanics, Blurry Photos
This was purchased as a gift for my daughter. I am sorry to say that I regret buying it and it is now too late to return it. Her cellphone takes better pictures. This device is of terribly poor quality. Buyer beware.
Question : Do you know of a digital slr camera that can attach old lens from non digital slr camera?
I know generally the camera has to be of the same brand; ie. Canon lens for a Canon camera. I was just wondering does anybody know of a digital slr camera that can do this. If not, maybe you can tell me which camera you have and if it is good or not.Thanks alot.
Answer:
All Pentax DSLRs can use any pentax lens EVER made.Also the IS thing the guy below mentioned. However, keep in mind that old Pentax lenses were made for 35mm SLRs, the equivalent to full frame cameras today. Pentax doesn't have full frame cameras yet, so images'll be cropped.
Question : What is the cheapest way to get a digital SLR camera?
And don't say steal it!I am a student photographer, and I used a standard canon digital camera, but I wan't something with more optical zoom that can be digital. I already have a canon film slr that my mom used to have, and frankly it is quite old and a hassle to carry around. I decided it might be best if I went ahead and invested in an slr, but i know those are extremely pricey! So, do you know where the best deals are for slr cameras, both on and offline?Or, if not, do you know what the best slr STYLED digital cameras are that are out there?Thank you so much!
Answer:
Depending on how serious you are into photography and what type of photography you are doing. I would personally recommend a second hand or refurbished digital SLR for starters. I bought mine second hand and paid only 1/4th of the original price.I own Canon EOS 10D,you can see some of my photography on my website.Then for the lens, the only problem with second hand is to be very very careful. You'll need to check and make sure that the glass has no marks and there is no dust inside, otherwise buy a new lens. Oh as you said you have a canon film slr, if it has autofocus lenses, you can use them with the digital slr so buy a body only and use existing lenses.Also note that, because the digital slr doesn't have sensor same size as 35mm, so whichever lens you use, you have to multiply it by 1.6 so for example 17mm lens will be converted to approx 27mm on digital slr.Hope this helps.P.S. : To start a photography as a student, none of the compact digital or bridge cameras will help, u'll need digital slr (depending on how serious you are as i said). Otherwise yes there are some digital bridge cameras which provides you with almost all features of an SLR but too slow and quality is not same. A canon bridge camera for example is Canon PowerShot G series or Canon PowerShot S2IS.
Question : Do all digital SLR cameras allow you to blur the background of a photo? What about shutter delay?
I know w/film SLR cameras you can blur the background; can you do the same w/all digital SLR cameras?Also do all digital SLR cameras allow you to take photos w/out a delay in the shutter?THANKS IN ADVANCE!
Answer:
Blur the background.. you're talking about depth of field? Yes, you should be able to do that with any digital slr; keep in mind though, if you are using autofocus, the camera is going to try to determine itself what you are trying to focus on. Switch to manual focusing and you can focus strictly on foreground objects, which should become blurred. The farther back they are, the more intense the blur. Different lenses will also affect this.As for the no delay in shutter speed, what do you mean exactly? That when you press the shutter button, the camera takes the picture instantaneously without having to think first? You just need to make sure the camera doesn't have any thinking to do before taking the picture - hold the shutter button in halfway to allow it to autofocus, then press fully when ready, OR switch to manual mode.
Question : What is the best digital SLR camera for a beginner ?
I don't know anything about professional photography, and I need a reasonable priced digital SLR to practice with. What do you suggest?
Answer:
Pick a well known brand (Nikon or Canon) as the additional equipment and lenses will transfer when you upgrade the camera as you become more experienced.Choose an entry level model that is in your price range. Don't think by spending more now, you will have a head start. Camera models and features expand at a greater rate than your pocket book. What you want is to learn the basics and familiarize yourself with the fundamentals of imaging. Remember the greatest photographers in the world took pictures with basic equipment and did not rely on sophisticated features. By remembering that, you won't get sold into economic disaster and become overwhelmed by advancements that apply in limited circumstances.
Question : What digital SLR camera would you recommend for a beginner?
I am 15 and have never photographed professionally before (apart form my 2.0 mega pixel phone camera) but I really want to startI would like a Digital SLR camera but my budget is only £140 - I wouldn't mind getting it second hand but you never know on the internet whether sources are trustworthy. Ideally the camera should be small and lightweight (and not too breakable!!) It doesn't even need to be SLR but I would like it to be good qualityWhat would you recommend?
Answer:
If you are just starting out and want to learn about photographic techniques there's no real benefit in jumping into DSLRs straight away...........unless someone offers you a real bargain.I would suggest you get some experience with a compact camera that has manual controls - aperture priority, shutter priority and fully manual. This will help you understand the importance of aperture, shutter speed etc. but you'll also be able to experiment with white balance ISO sensitivity and other variables.There aren't too many compacts that have fully manual controls but a delve into a variety of camera websites such as Steve's Digicams, DP Review and Cameralabs should provide you with some likely candidates.With your budget you might struggle to get the latest and greatest models but shop around. I picked up a Canon Powershot SX120 IS for just a little bit more than your budget which is a pretty new camera and has full manual options plus a 10x zoom and image stabilisation. I use it as a "take anywhere" camera and as a backup for my Nikon DSLR.
Question : What is the best digital SLR camera on the market at the moment in this price range?
I'm planning to spend between £450-£600 on a digital SLR camera sometime soon and I was wondering what the best one out there is at the moment.Preferably I'd like opinions from people who have actually had experience with cameras in general...I'd be interested to hear about noise handling in particular.
Answer:
There is no camera that is better than another in the price range. If you stick with brand names that you are familiar with, they will all be equally good. I would suggest that you look at Pentax, Olympus, Sony, Canon and Nikon and then look for the best "kit" of package deal on the unit you choose. I think you can find an excellent camera for that price and walk off with enough cash to do something else with it.
Question : What digital SLR camera is a good buy? inexpensive and good quality?
I want to get a digital SLR camera to play with photography. My point and shoot digital camera doesn't give me depth of field, pictures look flat. What digital SLR camera is not that expensive but gives you good quality of photos?
Answer:
Any Digital SLR will run you 700+.I suggest starting with a film SLR.Find one on ebay for under $100.Shoots great and you learn a lot more than the automatic digital help that many digital SLRs have.Then once you feel that photography is actually something worth investing in, then research and find one right for you!
Question : What kind of digital SLR camera is best for beginners?
I've taken a recent interest in photography - I've always taken pictures with a normal digital point and shoot camera, but I really really want a beginner SLR camera, which can take really nice pictures but is reasonably priced. I don't know ANYTHING about SLR cameras, but the ones I've looked at so far are the Nikon D40, and the Canon Rebel, and the Pentax K110.... any advice?
Answer:
The Nikon D40 is probably the best beginner SLR, especially for the price.Stepping up from there, consider the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT, the Nikon D40x, and the Canon EOS Rebel XTi.The Pentax K100D super is also a good choice, but I think the Nikon is better built.
Question : What kind of Digital SLR camera should i buy?
I want to get a digital SLR camera and planning on spending about $500, but i dont know which one i should get. I have been seeing XSi on some DSLR and some that don't have it on it. What does it mean? What is the better brand that i should get?
Answer:
you can consider buying Nikon D3000 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S DX VR Nikkor Zoom Lenshttp://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002JCSV5I?ie=UTF8&tag=bestdeals-y-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&cr eative=390957&creativeASIN=B002JCSV5ICanon Rebel XS 10.1MP Digital SLR Camera with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens# DIGIC III image processor provides fast, accurate image processing; Live View Function# EOS Integrated Cleaning system and Canon-designed Self Cleaning Sensor Unit, plus Dust Delete Data Detection in included softwarehttp://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001CBKJGG?ie=UTF8&tag=bestdeals-y-20&linkCode=as2&camp=178 9&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B001CBKJGGyou can find more options herehttp://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fs%3Fie%3DU TF8%26redirect%3Dtrue%26ref_%3Dsr%255Fnr%255Fn%255F0%26keywords%3Ddslr%26bbn%3D281052%26qid%3D126338 2072%26rnid%3D281052%26rh%3Dn%253A172282%252Ck%253Adslr%252Cn%253A%2521493964%252Cn%253A502394%252Cn %253A281052%252Cn%253A3017941&tag=bestdeals-y-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=390957
Question : What Digital SLR camera do you recommend that is around the £300 mark?
That's around $500 (US Dollars)I've had a Ricoh GX200 over the past year, which I absolutely love. I've got used to all the Manual features on that, so think I'm ready to step up to a DIGITAL SLR.
Answer:
Hey,Digital SLRs for around 500$ or less, that I recommend, are:- Canon EOS XTi/400D- Canon EOS XS/1000D- Canon EOS XSi/450D- Nikon D40/D40x- Nikon D60- Nikon D3000- Pentax K-xI have an article on my blog called 'Which DSLR to buy', what's important, what's not, megapixels, brand, features, models etc. Here is the link - http://the-digital-photographer.blogspot.com/2009/11/what-dslr-should-i-buy.html
